The Trade: American Dream Now a Part-Time Job and an Apartment

CNBC –

The American Dream used to be a house to call your own that you paid for with a steady paycheck after an honest day’s work. But in this post-financial-crisis nation, the dream for many now means having a part-time job and being able to rent an apartment.

And with unemployment and wages stagnant, as well as uncertainty about the costs of the new health care act for employers, the pared-down expectations may be a trend for years to come.

“The quality of the jobs being added are quite low, especially relative to the jobs that were lost,” said an economist from a major Wall Street investment bank, who declined to be named because he hasn’t published on this trend yet. “Homeownership, especially for the younger, is quite low, showing perhaps some secular decline.”

The jobs report on Friday showed that May unemployment was unchanged at 7.6 percent.

(Read More: How Home Ownership Causes Unemployment)

But digging deeper into the data reveals a different story. The unemployment rate was just 3.8 percent for those with a bachelor’s degree and higher. Its 7.4 percent for those with only a high school degree.

The number of workers who are “part-time for economic reasons” is higher than it has ever been after every recession since 1950, according to the Department of Labor.

And average weekly hours for private employees remains 33.6 hours—about what it was just after the recession ended in 2009.

We shouldn’t expect those average hours to rise, because small businesses and retailers face new health-care rules to be enacted in 2014. In fact, hours may even decline.

Read more

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Economy. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to The Trade: American Dream Now a Part-Time Job and an Apartment

  1. Roger Kempa says:

    •When HB 1522 passed the Senate, not one senator representing DuPage voted yes.

    Understandably, that was the only way to state the message in a positive fashion. Had Senator Dillard voted no, instead of not voting, the statement could have read as follows:

    •When HB 1522 passed the Senate, all senators representing DuPage voted no.

    Please, say it ain’t so. Hopefully, I made an error in the actual vote count.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s